Site has moved
As Inspired and the posts of J. Brad Hickman will no longer appear on blogspot. Please visit jbradhickman.com for the new posts. Thank you for reading.
As Inspired and the posts of J. Brad Hickman will no longer appear on blogspot. Please visit jbradhickman.com for the new posts. Thank you for reading.
Posted by
J Brad Hickman
at
10:32 PM
0
comments

Before I started law school I read Winston Churchill's four volume "History of the English Speaking Peoples." The purpose of Churchill's set was to outline a history of the people groups that speak English from the creation of Britannia through the developments of America, Australia, South Africa, Canada, etc. I read this history so that I would have a deeper understanding of where the laws of the United States originated. After all, the discipline of history exists so that we may learn from the past to improve for the future.
In some ways, Andrew Roberts accomplishes this purpose more effectively than Churchill. Perhaps much of this lies in the fact that Roberts' book covers the happenings of the last century. The events of the most recent years affect us more in some ways because we do not have the healing aspects of time. Throughout the 648 pages, Roberts is careful to point out the strengths and weaknesses of the English speaking peoples.
As a citizen of Great Britain, he is unbiased in his views towards the U.S., yet he makes no apologies for her hegemony. Furthermore, his conservative viewpoint is a breath of fresh air. In my opinion he was generally quite fair in his analysis, illustrating the good and bad of both Republicans and Democrats.
As I finished the book, I left with an emboldened foundation for many of the things I believe in. I also found myself frustrated with the downright stupidity and unawareness we have as a society of the greater context surrounding today's political climate. This is the first book I have read that I believe every American should be required to read.
Posted by
J Brad Hickman
at
9:29 AM
1 comments
Yesterday, I filled in 94 bubbles on a scantron to end three years of law school. I am finished. Tomorrow I will graduate, take a couple of days off, and begin preparing for the Bar Exam. I kind of feel like I did when I played football in high school. Friday night was exciting after a win and you knew you had the next two days to celebrate. However, you knew that on Monday, it was time to get ready for the next team.
I think the same concept applies to throwing a frisbee. You might make an incredible under-the-legs catch, but if you botch the next throw, then the consecutive catch-throw tally is once again shy of the record. In other words, I think all of life brings a big accomplishment. You have a little time to celebrate, but it is soon time to move onto the next challenge.
Before I get there, I am going to celebrate. Part of this celebration entails reflecting on things I learned (or things I already knew but were reinforced) in my three years of law school.
> Confidence is important -- One of my professors told us, "Even if you don't know the answer, act like you know the answer." He went on to say that if we were in front of a judge, it would not be good for your client if you said, "I guess the answer is..." or "I don't know." His point was not that we should feign knowing, but that we should have confidence.
Posted by
J Brad Hickman
at
9:34 AM
1 comments
Ryan Hall will represent the United States running the Marathon in the 2008 Olympic Games in Beijing. As of this past week, he is now the fastest American born marathoner. He ran the London marathon in 2 hours, 6 minutes, 17 seconds. That is unbelievably fast.
Check out this video about Ryan's story.
Posted by
J Brad Hickman
at
2:44 PM
0
comments
The last several months I have been treading through Andrew Roberts, A History of the English Speaking Peoples Since 1900. I read Winston Churchill's four-volume set, A History of the English Speaking Peoples the summer before I started law school, so reading Roberts' work naturally seemed appropriate for my last year of law school.
Posted by
J Brad Hickman
at
8:15 PM
0
comments
Today, the New England Historical Genealogical Society released the various celebrities each of the three remaining presidential candidates are related to. The AP news story tagline focused on Hillary Clinton's kinship with Angelina Jolie and Barack Obama's kinship with Brad Pitt.
Posted by
J Brad Hickman
at
5:36 PM
1 comments
Sorry for the delayed posting -- I had the pleasure of skiing Winter Park last week for my last spring break.
Posted by
J Brad Hickman
at
4:46 PM
0
comments
No guilt in life, no fear in death—
This is the pow'r of Christ in me
Posted by
J Brad Hickman
at
3:53 PM
0
comments
From time to time, I become concerned with the amount of oil that exists, primarily because I know it is going to affect my pocket book. It seems this concern is unfounded. An opinion piece in today's The Wall Street Journal entitled, "The World Has Plenty of Oil," provides a synopsis as to why the world is not going to be running out of oil anytime soon. While I think you should read the article, I want to mention some of the things I found interesting.
Posted by
J Brad Hickman
at
4:07 PM
1 comments
I found this little anecdote on the web today (compliments of Wise Bread). It makes a solid point.
Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:
The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay $1.
The sixth would pay $3.
The seventh would pay $7.
The eighth would pay $12.
The ninth would pay $18.
The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.
So, that's what they decided to do. The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve.
"Since you are all such good customers", he said, "I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20". Drinks for the ten now cost just $80.
The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But what about the other six men - the paying customers? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his "fair share?"
They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer. So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.
And so:
The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).
The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33%savings).
The seventh now pay $5 instead of $7 (28%savings).
The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).
The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).
The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).
Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings.
"I only got a dollar out of the $20," declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man, "but he got $10!"
"Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a dollar, too. It's unfair that he got ten times more than I!"
"That's true!!" shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get $10 back when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!"
"Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison. "We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!"
The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.
The next night the tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!
And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.
David R. Kamerschen, Ph.D.
Professor of Economics, University of Georgia
_____________________________________________________________
Posted by
J Brad Hickman
at
1:06 PM
3
comments
Games. Card Games. Board Games. Spontaneous Games. Football Games. Baseball Games. Golf Games. I like games.
Posted by
J Brad Hickman
at
7:34 PM
1 comments
The writer's strike has had a bizarre impact on Heidi and I -- it has affected me more than I thought it would. As part of the strike, we have been watching different shows online. However, this post is not about feeling "lost" from the lack of shows on tv or the numerous amount of shows online. This post is about one of the more remarkable television shows I have had the pleasure of viewing.
Posted by
J Brad Hickman
at
7:24 PM
1 comments
On the onset, let me apologize for the political nature of my posts this week. The political process is one of my interests, so if it is not particularly one of yours, hang with me a little while longer and I will return to my more random-topic approach.
Several thoughts have crossed my mind this week as I have spoken with people, read major news sources, listened to talk radio, and observed the candidates themselves. To repeat all of those thoughts here would end up becoming a random and confusing stream of consciousness. Instead I will mention one quote I found especially insightful, and one pervading thought throughout the week.
Quote from Newsweek : "It's no accident that the GOP race is down to three men who are clear about who they are: McCain, Huckabee, and, yes, Ron Paul." See the full article here.
Pervading Thought : There is still a lot of time in this primary left. Even though it seems that McCain has clinched the nomination and the race is over, it is not. If there is one thing I have learned from watching football, it is that there is a reason you play every second of all four quarters. So it is in the game of politics.
I mentioned several months ago that I have spoken with several people that said, "I really like Huckabee, I agree with him, and I like his character; but, I just do not think he can win so I am going to vote for [McCain, Thompson, Romney, etc.]." I noted that if those people would chose to support the candidate they believe most qualified, and not jump on the bandwagon of who they think will win, then their candidate just might win.
Voting according to your convictions is especially important at this stage of the game. Voting according to your convictions serves a couple of purposes:
Posted by
J Brad Hickman
at
4:18 PM
2
comments
It frustrates me to no end that various pundits say, "A vote for Huckabee is a vote for McCain." Romney and his supporters are calling Huckabee a spolier, claiming that he is stealing votes away from Romney.
Has it occurred to anyone that a vote for Romney might be a vote for McCain? Is it possible that Romney might be stealing votes away from Huckabee?
As I was complaining about the bad rap Huckabee is receiving from Romney, Rush Limbaugh, and Sean Hannity, I heard someone on CBS state that everything Romney is complaining about might be the reverse. In other words, that Romney might be hurting Huckabee's run.
Listening to Hannity and Limbaugh on a daily basis, I understand why they do not like Huckabee. But I think that those matters are fairly insignificant, and Huckabee far surpasses Romney as someone I would trust in the White House.
Super Tuesday has fully lived up to its name and who knows what is going to happen before the night is over. One thing seems fairly certain, we will not have a clear winner by the end of the night.
-----------------
realclearpolitics.com has one of the better displays of election coverage. Concise and clear.
Posted by
J Brad Hickman
at
8:43 PM
0
comments
Posted by
J Brad Hickman
at
9:04 PM
0
comments
Two years have passed since I have been on a mountain. That is too long. Whenever people ask the question, "mountains or beach?" I invariably choose the mountains. My brother has always been the more aquatic -- I think he might literally be a fish. Heidi also chooses the beach-- it is where she is most at home. Fortunately, I am scheduled to visit the Rockies in March, but this morning God provided me a small taste of the mountains in a cup of coffee.
I have been brewing Folger's coffee in our house for the last several months and I generally use the same ratio of water to coffee grounds. For the two of us, 5 scoops to the 8 water mark. For some reason though, this morning, when I tasted the coffee, I instantly felt like I was in the mountains. With each drink, the crisp air and overwhelming majesty of the mountains flooded my senses.
Each day, I want my eyes opened to the mysteries and majesty of God. He is revealing himself to us -- we just need to see.
"He who forms the mountains,
creates the wind,
and reveals his thoughts to man,
he who turns dawn to darkness,
and treads the high places of the earth—
the LORD God Almighty is his name."
-- Amos 4:13
**I took this picture a few years ago after a hike up Conejos Peak in Southern Colorado. It is what the coffee reminded me of this morning.
Posted by
J Brad Hickman
at
10:53 AM
1 comments
I received several cool gadgets for Christmas such as a watch (from my parents) for running that has a gps system and heart-rate monitor built in. However, for certain reasons, I have not been able to run the last few weeks, and therefore have not been able to use the watch.
I have been able to use the iPhone Eric and Lori (my in-laws) gave me. If you are wondering if the iPhone is overhyped, let me clear up any confusion -- it is not. It really is as cool as the commercials make it out to be.
Working part-time while finishing up law school full-time, the iPhone has handily allowed me to take care of other business that does not receive a scheduled time-slot, but is important all the same.
I do not want to encourage materialism, but you need to check the iPhone out.
Posted by
J Brad Hickman
at
4:30 PM
0
comments
Enjoy this video from the band Ok Go. It keeps getting better.
Posted by
J Brad Hickman
at
9:12 AM
1 comments
I am in the middle of watching the Republican debate in South Carolina on FoxNews. Earlier today I read that Fred Thompson had hinted that he was going to attack Mike Huckabee in the debate, thus piquing my interest. It happened, and I think it happened somewhat blatantly. You should try to watch the video.
Romney, McCain, and Huckabee each had an opportunity to discuss the legacy of Reagan, and whether or not the "Regan Coalition" still existed. Thompson wanted to interject, and he listed off several ways he felt Huckabee differed from Reagan. In my opinion, some of the things he said were true, some were false, but mainly he just seemed to be angry. Thankfully, I thought that Huckabee responded calmly and with dignity.
I have been slightly encouraged by several of the debates thus far, but I am disappointed and a little discouraged by what I saw from several of the candidates tonight. I hope that the candidates decide to treat each other with cordiality and kindness. Are they going to be using this same fruitless anger and mode of attack to those they disagree with if they make it into office?
-------
[After the Debate] From what I have read, most seem to think Thompson won. I guess his response helped him. I disagree. I liked Thompson, but I lost a lot of respect for him tonight. It seemed uncharacteristic.
I am supporting Huckabee, and while I do not agree with every viewpoint of his, I do think Thompson accurately stated Huckabee's record and misstated Huckabee's record.
Posted by
J Brad Hickman
at
8:34 PM
0
comments